Cut repeat forms and wasted work

Find tasks that ask for the same facts twice. Cut them. Show why each rule for a small firm is needed.

Our planUpdated:

Our argument

Public rules should earn the time they take. If two offices need the same fact, they should explain why it must be filed twice. Cut wasted work while keeping checks that protect people.

What must change

Find tasks that ask for the same facts twice. Cut them. Show why each rule for a small firm is needed.

What a win looks like

Less time on repeat forms, with privacy and useful safeguards intact.

Public cost

We have not yet priced this ask for the public purse. Any public aid must be priced before we seek funds for it.

The evidence

This case is a proposal. We have not yet published a measured claim for it. The research we still need is set out below.

Studies and notes

No case study is published here yet. This is the next question to check.

What we need to check

Follow a small firm through one full year of forms. Count hours and fees. Distinguish useful checks from duplicate work.

Updates

— Case opened with our argument, our ask and the facts still to check.

Back this front: Government that works

This button backs the whole front shown below. It does not turn on emails.

Support totals are not available right now.

Each email counts once per cause. This does not sign a petition. Your name and email stay private. Only the total is public.

More cases on this front

See the whole agenda ↗