Accept trusted tests from abroad

Accept sound US safety tests that meet our needs. Require a clear reason for each extra test.

Our planUpdated:

Our argument

Keep safety. End tests that repeat sound work without adding protection. We want trusted US tests to count where they meet the same need. A safety mark and the standard it tests are not the same thing.

What must change

Accept sound US safety tests that meet our needs. Require a clear reason for each extra test.

What a win looks like

A clear list of accepted proof, fewer repeat tests and measured savings for buyers.

Public cost

We have not yet priced this ask for the public purse. Any public aid must be priced before we seek funds for it.

The evidence

S-E01

Health Canada lists CSA, cUL and cETL as safety marks for goods that use power.

Limits: This does not show that a US-only mark is accepted. A mark on a product does not approve a whole building or how the product is put in.

S-E03

BC explains that Z240 home rules and A277 factory checks do different jobs.

Limits: The guide also covers site work and energy rules. It is BC advice. It does not prove that US home rules are equal or that a home can be lived in on a given lot.

Studies and notes

What we need to check

Compare matched products and whole homes. Ask which Canadian test adds safety, what it costs and whether other proof would work.

Updates

— Case opened with our argument, our ask and the facts still to check.

— A safety mark is not the whole rule.

Back this front: Safety & standards

This button backs the whole front shown below. It does not turn on emails.

Support totals are not available right now.

Each email counts once per cause. This does not sign a petition. Your name and email stay private. Only the total is public.

More cases on this front

See the whole agenda ↗