What this covers
Place: Canada
Time covered: Model of the 1870s to 1880s economy
What this does not prove
This is not a growth rate. A separate loss-only sum leaves out gains from trade prices and tax revenue. That is not the same net sum turning negative.
Read the source
The Welfare Effects of Protection: A General Equilibrium Analysis of Canada's National Policy ↗
Alexander and Keay / Bank of Canada Staff Working Paper 2017-18 · 2017-05
Where to look: Table 3 A-C: all reported general-equilibrium National Policy effects positive, 0.03–0.20% of GDP; panel D reports a separate partial-equilibrium loss measure
Bank of Canada: The Welfare Effects of Protection: A General Equilibrium Analysis of Canada's National Policy, 2017-05. Source terms ↗
Fixes and updates
No fact has changed in this version. If we fix a claim, we will add the date and explain the change here and in our list of fixes.
