These six economies had different paths. The lines show average tariff rates, with more weight on goods bought in larger amounts. They do not show growth.
Time covered: 1999 — 2022
Showing: 1999 — 2022
Canada
1.4Last point · 2022 · PercentChange over 10 years: -0 percentage points2012 → 2022
Chile
0.5Last point · 2022 · PercentChange over 10 years: -1.3 percentage points2012 → 2022
Australia
1Last point · 2022 · PercentChange over 10 years: -0.8 percentage points2012 → 2022
India
4.6Last point · 2022 · PercentChange over 10 years: -1.7 percentage points2012 → 2022
Bangladesh
10.6Last point · 2022 · PercentChange over 10 years: -2.3 percentage points2012 → 2022
United States
1.5Last point · 2022 · PercentChange over 10 years: -0.2 percentage points2012 → 2022
Percent
A change from 6% to 7% is one percentage point.
Lines show the weighted average tariff for Canada, Chile, Australia, India, Bangladesh and the United States from 1999 to 2022, in per cent.
Checked:
This table has the same values as the chart. You can scroll the table sideways.
| Time | Canada | Chile | Australia | India | Bangladesh | United States |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1999 | 1.01% | 9.96% | 6.1% | 28.51% | 18.51% | 2.31% |
| 2000 | 1.31% | 9% | 5.83% | 23.36% | 18.1% | 2.1% |
| 2001 | 1.6% | 8% | 4.8% | 26.51% | 17.88% | 2.11% |
| 2002 | 1.49% | 6.96% | 3.69% | 23.08% | 18.31% | 2.16% |
| 2003 | 2.46% | 5.77% | 3.74% | 21.45% | 19.06% | 1.96% |
| 2004 | 1.51% | 3.95% | 3.69% | 22.96% | 15.8% | 1.79% |
| 2005 | 1.46% | 3.99% | 3.07% | 13.9% | 22.7% | 1.75% |
| 2006 | 1.45% | 2.36% | 3.38% | 8.99% | 21.62% | 1.7% |
| 2007 | 1.54% | 2.95% | 3.45% | 11.99% | 9.23% | 1.55% |
| 2008 | 1.54% | 2.27% | 3.15% | 5.98% | 7.71% | 1.58% |
| 2009 | 1.7% | 1.92% | 3.67% | 6.84% | 10.71% | 1.71% |
| 2010 | 1.46% | 2.08% | 2.8% | 6.1% | 9.94% | 1.66% |
| 2011 | 1.38% | 1.98% | 1.77% | 7.33% | 9.63% | 1.67% |
| 2012 | 1.4% | 1.78% | 1.81% | 6.32% | 12.84% | 1.67% |
| 2013 | 1.45% | 5.89% | 1.84% | 6.34% | 12.09% | 1.67% |
| 2015 | 1.65% | 0.64% | 1.9% | 7.32% | 11.82% | 1.69% |
| 2016 | 1.56% | 5.89% | 1.18% | 6.35% | 10.72% | 1.65% |
| 2019 | 1.51% | 0.43% | 0.77% | 6.59% | 8.64% | 13.78% |
| 2020 | 1.49% | 0.43% | 0.71% | 6.19% | 10.99% | 1.52% |
| 2021 | 2.35% | 0.43% | 0.81% | 5.87% | 10.95% | 1.47% |
| 2022 | 1.37% | 0.46% | 0.99% | 4.59% | 10.56% | 1.49% |
A rate chart is a place to start, not a test of cause. A change in the average can come from new rules or from different goods being bought. Use stronger studies to judge effects on growth.
Stop waiting for growth from a tax wall. Drop the wall and count the real gains: lower prices, cheaper parts, more choice.
Source released:
The World Bank: World Development Indicators: tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products (%), 2026-10-08. Used under CC BY 4.0. We chose data, drew charts and changed units where noted. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Source terms ↗ · CC BY 4.0 ↗
WAKE UP CANADA
Help more people see the facts and the plan.
These six economies had different paths. The lines show average tariff rates, with more weight on goods bought in larger amounts. They do not show growth.
Keep the source, date and notes with the image.
Checked:
What this does not show: This chart has no growth series. Our country comparisons cannot identify the effect of tariffs on growth. The same rate change need not mean the same policy change.
No account needed. Sharing does not sign you up for email.
If the image opens in a new tab, press and hold it or use your browser’s save tool.
The World Bank: World Development Indicators: tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products (%), 2026-10-08. Used under CC BY 4.0. We chose data, drew charts and changed units where noted. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Source terms ↗ · CC BY 4.0 ↗
