Report · Published

Let people live near the work they do.

Our metro areas make a large amount of output. Their success should also mean homes people can afford and shorter daily trips.

What we found

Use the date on the numbers.

The metro GDP source runs to 2022. Toronto made $522.379 billion in that year; Montréal made $279.501 billion. These are totals at that year’s prices, not real growth or amounts per person. [1]

Show every metro in the source.

Our history includes all 41 metro areas in the table. Six begin in 2021. Ottawa–Gatineau adds its Ontario and Quebec parts once each. [1]

Our case for change

A city is a place to live, not just a GDP total. Allow homes to rent and buy near jobs, shops and schools. Give small homes, flats and quiet local firms a fair place on the same street.

A metro area is bigger than city hall.

A metro area includes nearby towns linked to a city. It can cross city limits and, for Ottawa–Gatineau, a provincial border. Its GDP does not belong to one local council.

We keep the source’s areas and dates. We do not divide these totals by a city population with different borders. That would make a false figure per person.

[1]

Build places for a better daily life.

Let homes and useful local shops share a street. Put homes near work and services. Plan safe walking routes, bike links and public transit as well as roads.

Keep both rent and ownership in view. More units matter, but people also need fair paths to own a home and build wealth. A low purchase price far from daily needs is not the whole cost of life.

Judge the full local plan.

Track rents, purchase prices, travel time and the cost to run streets and pipes. Show who can stay as the area grows. Ask people with low incomes and disabled people whether access improves.

A small town can use these ideas in its own way. The goal is an easier life, not making every place look the same.

The strongest challenge to our case

Higher nominal GDP can reflect higher prices. It can also go with costly housing and long trips. The chart does not prove that zoning caused its path. A sound reform case needs land-use, housing and travel evidence as well.

[1]

What we want changed

  1. Make room near daily needs

    Allow more homes and quiet shops near work, schools and services.

  2. Connect the whole trip

    Make walking, rolling, cycling and transit safe and useful.

  3. Test life, not just output

    Publish housing costs, travel time and access beside GDP.

Who can act

Local councils, provinces, territories and federal housing and transport offices.

What this could cost the public

Street, transit and service work need local budgets. Include upkeep. No total saving is claimed.

Explore the data behind the case

Each chart has its own dates, sources and limits. Open it to see the full data and download the figures.

Check the sources

Source title in English

  1. Statistics Canada — 36-10-0468-01 ↗

WAKE UP CANADA

Share the case for change

Help more people see the facts and the plan.

Let people live near the work they do.

Our metro areas make a large amount of output. Their success should also mean homes people can afford and shorter daily trips.

Keep the source, date and notes with the image.

Checked:

What this does not show: These are current dollars, so price rises can lift the lines. This is not real growth or output per person. Metro areas extend beyond city limits. We keep the source’s areas, which may differ from today’s boundaries. The last year is 2022.

wakeupcanada.ca/en/investigations/cities-need-homes-near-work/
Scan to open this page
Scan this code to read the full case.

Save an image

If the image opens in a new tab, press and hold it or use your browser’s save tool.

Sources and notes

Back this cause: Homes & neighbourhoods

This supports the whole cause. Emails are a separate choice.

Support totals are not available right now.

Each email counts once per cause. This does not sign a petition. Your name and email stay private. Only the total is public.

Keep reading

All reports and studies ↗